COPYRIGHT VS DEFAMATION
Firstly, Dhanush being the producer of the above mentioned cinematograph film is the rightful and 1 st owner of the copyrighted work in the absence of any agreement to the contrary. As per the Section 17 of the copyright Act, 1957. Further, Section 14 of the Act is exhaustive of the ways in which an owner of a copyright can exploit his work.
Actor Nayanthara in her public letter addressed to Actor Dhanush was very derogatory in nature and was in many places a personal attack on his character and defamatory in nature. Nevertheless, in the given case Actor Dhanush being the copyright owner has aright to exploit the same. The question now remains whether the damages of rupees 10 Crore claimed by Actor Dhanush is exorbitant. However, it is important to note that the documentary of Actor Nayanthara is a commercial project.
An Amicable settlement between the parties would have been beneficial to both of
them.
In this context I would like to bring to light the Doctrine of fair use.
Doctrine of fair use is an exception to the regular norm under the copyright law. Under the Doctrine of fair use, the law allows to reference or incorporate the work of another author into your own without obtaining permission to do so. Fair use usually applies to non-commercial uses, such as News reporting, Reviews and Commentary, Research or educational purpose and Parody. However, this is a very technical question that the Court decides by looking at the facts of the case. These factors include the purpose of the use, the nature of the work, the amount and how substantial is the portion used, and the effect of the use on the potential market or value of the copyrighted work.
In the given case I leave to the reader to ascertain.