Skip to main content

FEATURED POST

IP UNFOLD MONTHLY IP INFO-FEBRUARY, 2025

  1. Casio Wins Landmark Unfair Competition Case in China   Casio secured a major victory in China as the Guangdong High Court ruled against two watchmakers for copying its GA-110 design. The court awarded Casio Rmb3 million (US$413,500) in damages, reinforcing trade dress protection even after design patents expire. This sets a key precedent for brand owners fighting copycats.     2. Cambodia Launches Online Patent & IP Filing System   Cambodia has introduced online filing for patents, utility models, and industrial designs, streamlining the process and enhancing accessibility. The system, backed by WIPO, improves efficiency while ensuring security through strict applicant verification.   3. Thailand to Adjust International IP Fees from 2025 Starting February 1, 2025, Thailand will revise fees for international applications, including search and processing fees. Late payments will face a 50% surcharge, while eligible applicants may receiv...

COPYRIGHT VS DEFAMATION





             The recent tussle between the well-known actors Actor Dhanush and  Actor Nayanthara over the use of few seconds of  behind the scenes footage from the movie sets of the movie ‘Nanum Rowdy Thaan’ in her recent Netflix release NAYANTHARA - beyond the fairy tale, is all over the internet. While there are people voicing out in favor of both the actors, this article is only trying to explore the legal aspects involved in this issue.

Firstly, Dhanush being the producer of the above mentioned cinematograph film is the rightful and 1 st owner of the copyrighted work in the absence of any agreement to the contrary. As per the Section 17 of the copyright Act, 1957. Further, Section 14 of the Act is exhaustive of the ways in which an owner of a copyright can exploit his work.

Actor Nayanthara in her public letter addressed to Actor Dhanush was very derogatory in nature and was in many places a personal attack on his character and defamatory in nature. Nevertheless, in the given case Actor Dhanush being the copyright owner has aright to exploit the same. The question now remains whether the damages of rupees 10 Crore claimed by Actor Dhanush is exorbitant. However, it is important to note that the documentary of Actor Nayanthara is a commercial project.

An Amicable settlement between the parties would have been beneficial to both of

them.

In this context I would like to bring to light the Doctrine of fair use.

Doctrine of fair use is an exception to the regular norm under the copyright law. Under the Doctrine of fair use, the law allows to reference or incorporate the work of another author into your own without obtaining permission to do so. Fair use usually applies to non-commercial uses, such as  News reporting, Reviews and Commentary, Research  or educational  purpose and Parody. However, this is a very technical question that the Court decides by looking at the facts of the case. These factors include the purpose of the use, the nature of the work, the amount and how substantial is the portion used, and the effect of the use on the potential market  or value of the copyrighted work.

 In the given case I leave to the reader to ascertain.