Skip to main content

FEATURED POST

COPYRIGHT VS DEFAMATION

             The recent tussle between the well-known actors Actor Dhanush and  Actor Nayanthara over the use of few seconds of  behind the scenes footage from the movie sets of the movie ‘Nanum Rowdy Thaan’ in her recent Netflix release NAYANTHARA - beyond the fairy tale, is all over the internet. While there are people voicing out in favor of both the actors, this article is only trying to explore the legal aspects involved in this issue. Firstly, Dhanush being the producer of the above mentioned cinematograph film is the rightful and 1 st owner of the copyrighted work in the absence of any agreement to the contrary. As per the Section 17 of the copyright Act, 1957. Further, Section 14 of the Act is exhaustive of the ways in which an owner of a copyright can exploit his work. Actor Nayanthara in her public letter addressed to Actor Dhanush was very derogatory in nature and was in many places a personal attack on his character and defamatory in nature. Nevertheless, in the given case

Is Fan Fiction legal and acceptable ?

 



Fans can be really crazy!

They go crazy collecting posters, stickers, toys, dolls, comics, books and other merchandise of their favourite characters and personalities.  Eg: Superman, Batman, Barbie, Ben10, Baahubali, Chota Bheem, Angry Birds, Movie Stars and Sports Personalities etc. There are still crazier fans, who anxiously stand in long queues before the book stores on the day of release of their favourite Books and Comics such as the Harry Potter series, Twilight series, Jeffrey Archer novels, etc. Likewise, you can find large group of youngsters before the cinema houses on the day of release of movies of their favourite stars. Fans are everywhere, fans are diverse. We can find them in cricket stadiums, auditoriums, Theatres, Book Fairs and so on.

What is fan fiction?

Fan fiction is stories and novels written by fans about characters or settings from an original work of fiction and includes characters from movies, TV shows, popular sports stars etc. Sometimes, it’s created to criticize a character in their own perception.

Such fans are so much in love with the characters and personalities that they want more out of them and engage in fan fiction.  Some believe that Fan fiction is another wonderful new genre. The bestselling “Fifty Shades of Grey began as Twilight fan fiction”. Fan fiction makes a work popular; promotes the original work; often serves as free promotion, keeping audiences interested and entertained between new releases. They also create awareness of the original work.

Copyright and Fan Fiction

Fan fiction usually falls under "derivative works" of the copyrighted work. Fan fiction may be categorized as derivative works because they use the copyright protected characters from someone else's creation.

In Eastern Book Company v. D.B. Modak, the Supreme Court referred to “derivative works” as a contribution of original material to a pre-existing work so as to recast, transform or adapt the pre-existing work.

Fan fictions can affect moral rights of an author if the work so created mutilates or distorts the original work or the reputation of the author.  As per the law of Copyrights, the author can take action against any mutilation; distortion etc. of his copyrighted work even after the copyright in the work has expired.

Fan fiction writers do not usually intend to sell their work for commercial benefits. If they try to sell, it will be infringing the copyright of the owner.

Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. and J. K. Rowling v. RDR Books (the Harry Potter Lexicon case)

In the present case, the defendant was sued for copyright infringement for attempting to publish the print version of his online lexicon (a free online guide to the Harry Potter fictional universe,) The plaintiffs argued that defendant's attempt to publish for profit a print facsimile of the Harry Potter Lexicon, constituted an infringement of their copyright and was not protected by the defense of fair use.

Plaintiff contented that she herself plans to write a Harry Potter encyclopedia and that the publication of a similar book before her own would hurt the proceeds of the official encyclopedia, which she plans to give to charity.

The Court held that "Plaintiffs have shown that the lexicon copies a sufficient quantity of the Harry Potter series to support a finding of substantial similarity between the Lexicon and Rowling's novels".

This case clearly shows that fan fictions can only be tolerated if they do not work for commercial benefits.  Dire consequences could be faced by fan fiction authors in cases where they publish their work for commercial benefits.

Fan fictions can be exempted from copyright infringement provided they prove to be a fair use under the copyright law.

In the case of The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v. Narendra Publishing House and Ors.,  the Delhi High Court  emphasized the four  tests analysis laid down by Congress in  17 U. S. C. §107 as especially relevant in determining whether the use of a copyrighted character was fair :-

What are all considered as Fair use?

    Fair use considers four conditions:

        1. Purpose of the work

        2. Nature of the copyrighted work

        3. Amount of the work copied

        4. Effect on the original work

It is clearly evident from the above analysis that fan fictions can be treated as fair use under the copyright law.

Fan fictions are healthy as they give opportunity to amateur creators to create the world of their imagination. Though lot of authors have approved Fan Fictions, lot many take it as a lame practice.

In India, the author retains their rights over a work for the entirety of their life, plus the 60 years that follow their death. This varies from country to country; if a thing is in the public domain then it can be used freely in any work. This includes characters such as our characters from our epics, kings, mythological characters like Hanuman, Ram, Bheem,  Robin Hood, Hercules, Tarzan and Dracula, Cinderella, Snow White, etc., (which is why there’s an almost constant stream of movies, books, and video games starring these characters).

PUBLIC DOMAIN CHARACTERS

There are many public domain characters that are famous because of features added by later works. The most famous example is Universal’s hold over Frankenstein’s Monster. Universal invented their own ‘look’ when putting the monster onto the big screen. This means that you can write about Shelley’s monster, but if it has green skin, a flat-top head, and/or bolts through the neck, then you’re encroaching on Universal’s copyright. Likewise the famous “Chotta Bheem” is also a new version of the original legendry character “Bheem”. 

In some cases were the work is transformative and not essentially derivative i.e. to transform the copyrighted aspects into something new, then it’s likely to be not termed as copyright violation.

Finally, as long as you don’t intend to sell your work; mutilate or distort the original work; most are happy to allow fan fiction to flourish. Nevertheless, it’s always a good idea to begin with a disclaimer identifying the author of the source material.